Choose: < a consumption bundle >
In order to maximize: < utility >
Subject to: < income and market prices >
We now have the tools to understand consumer choices:
Budget constraint: consumer's constraints of income and market prices
choose a bundle of goods to maximize utility, subject to income and market prices
$$\max_{x,y} u(x,y)$$ $$s.t. p_xx+p_yy=m$$
1 See the mathematical appendix in today's class notes on how to solve it with calculus, and an example.
Graphical solution: Highest indifference curve tangent to budget constraint
B or C spend all income, but a better combination exists
Graphical solution: Highest indifference curve tangent to budget constraint
B or C spend all income, but a better combination exists
D is higher utility, but not affordable at current income & prices
$$\begin{align*} \text{indiff. curve slope} &> \text{budget constr. slope} \\\end{align*}$$
$$\begin{align*} \text{indiff. curve slope} &> \text{budget constr. slope} \\ | MRS_{x,y} | &> | \frac{p_x}{p_y} | \\ | \frac{MU_x}{MU_y} | &> | \frac{p_x}{p_y} | \\ | -2 | &> | -0.5 | \\\end{align*}$$
Consumer would exchange at 2Y:1X
Market exchange rate is 0.5Y:1X
$$\begin{align*} \text{indiff. curve slope} &> \text{budget constr. slope} \\ | MRS_{x,y} | &> | \frac{p_x}{p_y} | \\ | \frac{MU_x}{MU_y} | &> | \frac{p_x}{p_y} | \\ | -2 | &> | -0.5 | \\\end{align*}$$
Consumer would exchange at 2Y:1X
Market exchange rate is 0.5Y:1X
Can spend less on y more on x and get more utility!
$$\begin{align*} \text{indiff. curve slope} &< \text{budget constr. slope} \\\end{align*}$$
$$\begin{align*} \text{indiff. curve slope} &< \text{budget constr. slope} \\ | MRS_{x,y} | &< | \frac{p_x}{p_y} | \\ | \frac{MU_x}{MU_y} | &< | \frac{p_x}{p_y} | \\ | -0.125 | &< | -0.5 | \\\end{align*}$$
Consumer would exchange at 0.125Y:1X
Market exchange rate is 0.5Y:1X
$$\begin{align*} \text{indiff. curve slope} &< \text{budget constr. slope} \\ | MRS_{x,y} | &< | \frac{p_x}{p_y} | \\ | \frac{MU_x}{MU_y} | &< | \frac{p_x}{p_y} | \\ | -0.125 | &< | -0.5 | \\\end{align*}$$
Consumer would exchange at 0.125Y:1X
Market exchange rate is 0.5Y:1X
Can spend less on x, more on y and get more utility!
$$\begin{align*} \text{indiff. curve slope} &= \text{budget constr. slope} \\\end{align*}$$
$$\begin{align*} \text{indiff. curve slope} &= \text{budget constr. slope} \\ | MRS_{x,y} | &= | \frac{p_x}{p_y} | \\ | \frac{MU_x}{MU_y} | &= | \frac{p_x}{p_y} | \\ | -0.5 | &= | -0.5 | \\\end{align*}$$
Consumer would exchange at same rate as market
No other combination of \((x,y)\) exists at current prices & income that could increase utility!
$$\frac{MU_x}{MU_y} = \frac{p_x}{p_y}$$
$$\frac{MU_x}{MU_y} = \frac{p_x}{p_y}$$
$$\frac{MU_x}{p_x} = \frac{MU_y}{p_y}$$
$$\frac{MU_x}{p_x} = \frac{MU_y}{p_y} = \cdots = \frac{MU_n}{p_n}$$
Equimarginal Rule: consumption is optimized where the marginal utility per dollar spent is equalized across all \(n\) possible goods/decisions
You will always choose an option that gives higher marginal utility (e.g. if \(MU_x > MU_y)\)
$$\frac{MU_x}{p_x} = \frac{MU_y}{p_y} = \cdots = \frac{MU_n}{p_n}$$
$$\frac{MU_x}{p_x} = \frac{MU_y}{p_y} = \cdots = \frac{MU_n}{p_n}$$
Why is this the optimum? Example: suppose you could get a higher marginal utility per $1 for \(x\) than for \(y\) (i.e. "more bang for your buck"!)
Not maximizing your utility!
Continue until cost-adjusted marginal utilities are equalized
Any optimum in economics: no better alternatives exist under current constraints
No possible change in your consumption that would increase your utility
Markets make it so everyone faces the same relative prices
A person's optimal choice \(\implies\) they make same tradeoff as the market
markets equalize everyone's MRS
Two people will very different income and preferences face the same market prices, and choose optimal consumption (points A and A') at an exchange rate of \(0.5Y:1X\)
If people can learn and change their behavior, they will always switch to a higher-valued option
If a person has no better choices (under current constraints), they are at an optimum
If everyone is at an optimum, the system is in equilibrium
Example: You can get utility from consuming bags of Almonds \((a)\) and bunches of Bananas \((b)\), according to the utility function:
$$\begin{align*} u(a,b)&=ab\\ MU_a&=b \\ MU_b&=a \\ \end{align*}$$
You have an income of $50, the price of Almonds is $10, and the price of Bananas is $2. Put Almonds on the horizontal axis and Bananas on the vertical axis.
Example: You can get utility from consuming Burgers \((b)\) and Fries \((f)\), according to the utility function:
$$\begin{align*} u(b,f)&=\sqrt{bf} \\ MU_b&=0.5b^{-0.5}f^{0.5} \\ MU_f&=0.5b^{0.5}f^{-0.5} \\ \end{align*}$$
You have an income of $20, the price of Burgers is $5, and the price of Fries is $2. Put Burgers on the horizontal axis and Fries on the vertical axis.
Choose: < a consumption bundle >
In order to maximize: < utility >
Subject to: < income and market prices >
Keyboard shortcuts
↑, ←, Pg Up, k | Go to previous slide |
↓, →, Pg Dn, Space, j | Go to next slide |
Home | Go to first slide |
End | Go to last slide |
Number + Return | Go to specific slide |
b / m / f | Toggle blackout / mirrored / fullscreen mode |
c | Clone slideshow |
p | Toggle presenter mode |
t | Restart the presentation timer |
?, h | Toggle this help |
Esc | Back to slideshow |